As upside down as is, the world we live in is not too far off.
Compare and contrast the two novels as visions of a future that has gone dramatically wrong. Brave New World and were both written by men who had experienced war on the grand scale of the twentieth century. Disillusioned and alarmed by what they saw in society, each author produced a powerful satire and an alarming vision of future possibilities.
Although the two books are very different, they address many of the same issues in their contrasting ways.
Human beings and the goods they make are tailored to one another: The society presented in is less comfortably balanced. The population is kept content with a Comparison and contrast of 1984 and meagre lot because of the constant war, which, as is explicitly stated in the Book, is a convenient means of maintaining the status quo, and the Party keeps a very close watch on those members of society who are deemed capable of disrupting it.
Orwell posits a certain level of technological advance—the two-way television screens and the ever-present surveillance equipment, the novel-writing machines, but not much else. His purpose was not to imagine the details of such technologies, but to present the use to which they are put.
Huxley goes considerably further in imagining scientific advance. In his World State, humans are engendered and grown in artificial wombs. However, the idea of automation seems to have passed him by, so that people are grown for the purposes of toiling in factories or operating elevators.
Again, however, the author is not attempting to present a detailed picture of what life would be like in the far distant future; he is showing the effects of such things on human nature.
For both authors, a necessary action in their future societies is the abolition of the past. Thus the richness of human history is cast aside. The rejection of history takes a more aggressive form inwhere it becomes impossible to understand the past, because the details of the past are constantly rewritten to conform with the requirements of the present.
The concept of historical truth is irrelevant: Winston Smith himself takes part in this, rewriting the news: Just as history is effectively abolished in both societies, so is the family.
Huxley extrapolates the trend for elective childbearing until it becomes grotesque: Children are taught from their earliest years to give their loyalty to the Party and to Big Brother, and are encouraged to spy on and betray their own parents.
Thus the family becomes one more means of surveillance, so that everyone is surrounded by people who cannot be trusted. The reader can only be thankful Huxley does not go into details. In Brave New World, sexual intercourse is completely separate from reproduction. Along with the family unit, exclusive partnerships have been abolished.
Naturally, this sort of behaviour is incomprehensible to The Savage, who has been brought up on the edges of a quite different society—and in a close relationship with his mother, to boot.
The consequence of such absolute promiscuity is that sex becomes a mindless and meaningless act of no more significance than eating a bar of chocolate. In Oceania, sex is treated in a quite opposite manner. Sexual activity is discouraged, and divorced from pleasure.
Winston considers sex to be a political act, an expression of freedom. Julia puts her finger on it, explaining to Winston that sex makes people happy and relaxed, while the Party prefers that their energies be channelled into other activities.
With familial and sexual relationships either gone or terribly distorted, it is not surprising that both worlds also trivialise death. In Brave New World, individuals barely exist in the first place: The members of the World State do not grow and mature, and they never really come to terms with death.
Inpeople merely cease to exist.Five Reasons is Akin to George Orwell’s History erased: In , the key way Big Brother garnered so much power was by mind manipulation of the people. It ‘revised’ history – literally rewriting it to favor a communist agenda.
World wars were erased from history, major inventions and other moments of human greatness, gone. and V for Vendetta. Compare and Contrast Essay Comparing with V for Vendetta Both by George Orwell and V for Vendetta directed by James McTeigue depict dystopian totalitarian societies. versus Fahrenheit – a comparison by Theodora · Published November 26, · Updated November 2, was published by George Orwell, or Eric Blair, in Home Q & A how does the novel and the how does the novel and the movie v for vendetta contrast and compare?
V FOR VENDETTA. 's government succeeds in maintaining power by crushing outer Party members into conformity through fear, surveillance, dumbing down the language, and economic deprivation. A comparison/contrast paper could compare and contrast Winston Smith to John the Savage.
Compare and Contrast West Berlin, Germany, is blockaded by the Soviets. The Americans begin an airlift to help the stranded Berliners. The Berlin wall, built in to keep East Germans from defecting to the West, remains in place.